gen-z-developers.sgit.ai → Infographics → How they are made

How they are made, and how to review them

The infographics follow the rules the rest of this site follows: the source of truth is data in the repository, the picture is generated from it, and the build refuses what it can check is wrong.

Four altitudes

The brief for the second edition asked for an infographic at every altitude: the whole book on one page, a view per part, an infographic per chapter and how they connect, the graph of each area. Every proposal names its altitude: book (1), part (5), chapter (74), idea (1).

Methods

Every chapter proposal came back as code, and that is the right default: an infographic in this book shows a structure (a loop, a test, a sum, who can read what), and structure drawn from data stays correct when the text changes. Image models earn their place where a mood matters more than a structure: the part openers are proposed that way, for Dinis to decide.

The drawing

What the build refuses

States

How to review

  1. Open the plan, on a laptop or an iPad. Start with the drawn ones (filter State: drafted), then priority 1.
  2. For each card, press accept, change, decline or later, and write a line if you want: what to change, why not. It is kept in your browser only.
  3. Export the review as markdown or JSON from the bar at the top of the plan, and put it in the vault's reviews/ folder, or hand it to the agent.
  4. The agent records it: each verdict becomes the proposal's state, with decided_by naming you and the review file, in the next release. Accepted ones are drawn; changed ones redrawn; declined ones kept with the reason, so nobody proposes them again.

Data: plan.json. The agent that keeps it: the illustrator.